Dear Ann,
You hit the nail on the head: (to Scholar) "How WT of you not to provide a specific reference"
This was one of the very things that had me running when I read those "two scholarly articles" of Oct & Nov of 2011..
Oct 1, 2011 WT, page 31, pgph 2 states "Why did Ptolemy omit some rulers? Evidently, he did not consider them to be legitimate rulers of Babylon (footnote 10)
So, I look at the footnote, knowing full well that:
in the past, the WT (and it's other publications that I have studied from childhood, over and over and over and over again) and the Bible, has listed all the kings, in order, for this time period.
What does this foot note say??? " "Some scholars contend that certain kings were ommitted by Ptolemy..."
Nothing... no list, no names, no nothing. A whole article, supported by nothing......
When people have the truth, they should be able to produce evidence.
Words like "evidently" and "some scholars" can be used by anybody at anytime, and prove nothing.....
again, I must happily reply,
cha ching, cha ching, you aren't getting my bling no more$$$